|
Welcome to I-Cube: South Africa's leading provider of
License
Plate Recognition; Facial
Recognition & Image
Analysis |
|
|
DEMOS LPR Demo of RSA Customised Plates. zip (3 MB) SPEED DETERMINATION DEMO (2 MB) Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) for Law Enforcement KZN gets high-tech speed cameras New speed monitoring system tested Reference Sites Particulars of LPR projects carried out successfully |
AARTO: ROAD USERS RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS
The Administrative of Road Traffic Offences Act, No. 46 of 1998, (AARTO), which was approved by Parliament in 1998, will enter into force on 1 February 2008 [ if specific conditions are in place] in the magisterial district of Tshwane on a pilot basis for a period of 7 months. On 1 April 2008 the system will be rolled-out on a national basis. The objectives of AARTO are, amongst others : to encourage the payment of penalties imposed for infringements; to establish a procedure for the effective and expeditious adjudication of infringements; with the purpose to encourage compliance with the national and provincial laws and to alleviate the burden on the courts of trying offenders for infringements. AARTO further aims to penalise drivers and operators who are guilty of infringements or offences through the imposition of demerit points leading to the suspension and cancellation of driving licences, professional driving permits or operator cards. AARTO further imposes certain rights and obligations on drivers. These
include : payment of fines within 32 days, which will result in a substantial
discount; submit an application to make payments in installments; submit a
representation for consideration; provision of the name, ID number and contact
detail of the driver of the vehicle if the owners was not the driver at the time
of the offence; or elect to follow the court procedure. Upon payment of a fine,
demerit points applicable to the particular offence, would be allocated and
recorded against the name of the Infringer. The purpose of this paper is to explain how the system will work and impact on road users; provide some of the standardised fines and demerit points for some critical offences; as well as to briefly provide certain rights and obligations in this regard.
One of South Africa's greatest challenges is to reduce the carnage on our roads significantly. The fact that more than 90% of all road accidents are preceded by a road traffic offence, makes the improvement of road-user perceptions, attitudes and behaviour a matter of urgency. The challenge of a high rate of non-compliance with traffic regulations, coupled with a continuous downward trend in the finalization of offences and a judicial system that is unable to effectively deal with traffic infringements, must be dealt with absolute priority. The present system of fine collection is totally inadequate. Fines are either not paid, or are substantially reduced by the magistrates; or bribes are paid to get off the fine altogether. In some areas courts will only accept the hearing of a limited number of traffic violations, which is detrimental to the necessary successful conclusion of all traffic-related cases. Currently less than 20% of traffic cases are finalised and the fines paid. Two of the most important catalysts in effecting an improvement in driver behaviour and law compliance are well planned, efficient and effective law enforcement, coupled with and supported by an equally effective and just road traffic adjudication system. The current adjudication process, which results in many traffic notices not being considered by the courts and left un-concluded, de-motivates traffic officers. All traffic contraventions in terms of the provisions of the National Road Traffic Act (NRTA), 1996 (Act No 93 of 1996) and its Regulations are currently being administered in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No 51 of 1977). Most of the bigger traffic departments are operating some sort of Local Traffic Contravention Management System (LTCMS), such as Trafman, TCS, Cyprus or an own, customised developed system for the recording and administration of offences in this regard. There is currently no national road traffic contravention register in place. A system that will support the successful conclusion of each and every notice issued, should serve as motivation for traffic officers to undertake their task with more vigour. The Administrative of Road Traffic Offences (AARTO) Act, No. 46 of 1998, which was approved by Parliament in 1998 was, amongst others, created with the view to forge a closer and more effective and efficient link between enforcement and the adjudication process, yet which is still objective, transparent and fair. AARTO brings with it parity of fines which will encourage the road using public to take traffic offences and resulting fines much more seriously. It also brings with it improved fine collection procedures and a revenue stream that will be used for improving road safety; as well as more convenient ways of paying fines and more penalties for not paying within the prescribed time, eventually leading to confiscation of movable property and ultimately to being declared unfit to operate a motor vehicle. The purpose of the Act is to promote quality, safety and discipline in road traffic by providing for a scheme to discourage road traffic contraventions, to facilitate the adjudication of road traffic infringements, to support the prosecution of offences in terms of the national and provincial laws relating to road traffic, and implement a points demerit system; to provide for the establishment of an agency to administer the scheme; to provide for the establishment of a board to represent the agency; and to provide for matters connected therewith. The objects of the Act therefore are, despite the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977) :
At a meeting held with the Minister of Transport on Monday, 6 March 2007, it was decided that the AARTO Act must be implemented during 2007. It was further agreed that an AARTO pilot project would be introduced from 1 September 2007 in a specific geographical area to test the functionality of the system, forms and procedures. The system will be rolled-out nationally from 1 April 2008. 2. COMMITTING TRAFFIC OFFENCES AND INFRINGEMENTS In accordance with the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Act, No. 46 of 1998 (AARTO), if a person commits a road traffic violation in terms of the National Road Traffic Act, No. 93 of 1996, such violation will be categorised as follows:
A traffic offence is regarded as a very serious violation of the law, which warrants a major sentence on conviction, such as imprisonment, or a substantial monetary fine, or both. Traffic offences will therefore still be dealt with in terms of the Criminal Procedure Act, 1977 (Act No. 51 of 1977), which means an offender will be arrested, charged and the case will be placed on the role for a hearing in court. Minor and major infringements mean offences categorised as such in terms of section 29(a) of the AARTO Act, detail of which is provided in the Regulations. Traffic infringements will be dealt with in accordance with the administrative procedures, as prescribed in the AARTO Act. If a person is alleged to have committed an infringement, the traffic officer will issue an Infringement Notice. Infringement Notices will initially be written by hand while electronic notices; generated by means of hand-held computers used by traffic officers at the roadside, will be phased in over a period of time. In the case of so-called camera infringements, for example exceeding the speed limit and ignoring traffic signals; Infringement Notices will be electronically generated by the National Traffic Information System (NaTIS), and served on the Infringer by registered mail. On receiving through either registered mail, or being served in person with an Infringement Notice, an alleged Infringer has several choices that he or she should comply with within a period of 32 days after having received such notice. These choices are the following:
Failure by the alleged Infringer to exercise any of the above options within the prescribed time of 32 days, the following steps will be taken:
The AARTO process is schematically represented in Annexure A hereto and the individual steps in the process are discussed in more detail below. 3. COMPLYING WITH AN INFRINGEMENT NOTICE BY PAYING THE PENALTY Infringers may comply with an Infringement Notice by paying the penalty, as reduced by the discount amount shown on the Infringement Notice, to the issuing authority within a period of 32 days. Regardless the place of issue, payments can be made in the following manner:
On receipt of such payments the Agency will:
4. COMPLYING WITH AN INFRINGEMENT NOTICE BY SUBMITTING A REPRESENTATION OR APPLICATION, PROVIDING INFORMATION OR NOTIFICATION Infringers may further comply with an Infringement Notice by submitting a representation or application, or informing or notifying the Agency, in the prescribed manner, within a period of 32 days after being issued in person or receiving the Infringement Notice by registered mail, on the following: 4.1 Representations : Submit a Representation, only in the case of a minor infringement, to the Agency. Such Representations are made by submitting a sworn statement or affirmation indicating the existence of reasonable grounds why the Infringer should not be held liable for the penalty payable in terms of the Infringement Notice. The Agency will forward such Representations to an independent Representations Officer for consideration. The Representations Officer will :
4.2 Pay in Installments : Submit an Application to the Agency that payments be made in monthly installments. The Agency will investigate the credibility of the Infringer and inform him or her of the outcome and the monthly installments to be paid, should the Application be granted. The first instalment has to be paid within 32 days after receipt of the approval by the Infringer. Should the Application not be granted, the Infringer must pay the full penalty within 32 days after receipt of such notification plus the prescribed fee for the application. The discount are not applicable to payments made in installments or once an application has been received and recorded; or 4.3 Identification of Driver : Provide information, to the satisfaction of the Agency that he or she was not the driver of the motor vehicle at the time of the alleged infringement, together with the full name, acceptable identification; as well as residential and postal addresses and telephone numbers of the alleged driver or person in control of the vehicle at the time of the infringement. In such cases the Agency will cancel the original Infringement Notice and serve a second Infringement Notice per registered mail to the person so identified. Should such identified Infringer fail to respond in the prescribed manner within 32 days, the original Infringement Notice will be reinstated and the first Infringer will become liable to pay both the penalty and the prescribed fee of the Courtesy Letter to be issued in such a case; or: 4.4 Elect to follow Court Procedure : Notify the Agency of his or her intension to follow the court procedure. In such cases the Agency will cancel the Infringement Notice and instruct the issuing authority to issue a summons to the alleged Infringer to appear in court, which will be posted by registered mail. In addition to the penalty amount to be paid, prescribed fees will payable by the Infringer for the above Representations, if rejected, and Applications. The discount on the penalty is not applicable to nay of the above options. The prescribed forms on which such Representations or Applications, Information on drivers or Notifications is to be provided are obtainable as follows:
5. COURTESY LETTERS If an infringer has failed to comply with an Infringement Notice as described under 2 or 3 above, the Agency will issue a Courtesy Letter and serve it on the Infringer by registered mail. Such Courtesy Letter will inform the Infringer that:
Should the Infringer exercise more than one of the options provided under 5(b) above, and such options include 5(b)(i) and/or 5(b)(iii) – to pay the penalty, the matter will be concluded without consideration of any of the other options. Without following the issuing of an Infringement Notice, Courtesy Letters will be automatically generated by NaTIS and served on Infringers by registered mail for the following infringements after expiry thereof and the prescribed grace period lapsed:
6. NOTICES Notices will be issued in the following cases:
In the case of :
In the case where the Infringer fails to pay the penalty in installments as arranged, or makes an insufficient payment on an instalment, or the cheque used for payment of that instalment is dishonoured; the Infringer will be notified that:
7. ENFORCEMENT ORDERS Enforcement Orders will be issued if an Infringer has failed to comply with:
In such cases the following steps will be taken and accordingly recorded in the contraventions register on NaTIS:
The Infringer will simultaneously be notified of the following:
The Enforcement Order served on the Infringer will:
Until such time as an Infringer has paid the penalty and the additional fees as required in terms of an Enforcement Order, no:
will be issued to an Infringer or in respect of a motor vehicle which is registered in the name of the Infringer until such Enforcement Order has been complied with or has been revoked. 8. REVOCATION OF AN ENFORCEMENT ORDER An Enforcement Order will be revoked if:
If an Enforcement Order is revoked:
9. WARRANTS If an Infringer does not comply with the provisions of an Enforcement Order within 32 days after issuing thereof, a Warrant will be issued and handed to a Sheriff for execution, which will include:
An Infringer may, at any time prior to the execution of a Warrant, comply with an Enforcement Order through the payment of the penalty and all applicable fees, including the prescribed cost of the Warrant, in which case the Warrant will not be executed. If a Warrant has been executed, the payment of the penalty and fees from the proceeds of the execution will be recorded in the national contraventions register. 10. ALLOCATION OF DEMERIT POINTS A person, who has committed an offence or an infringement, incurs a number of demerit points ranging from 1 to 4 for any one offence or infringement committed, depending on the seriousness thereof. An example of demerit points, including penalties and discounts for some infringements, are attached under Annexure B. Demerit points are incurred on the date on which the penalty and fee, if any, imposed for the infringement are paid, an enforcement order is issued or the infringer is convicted of the offence in court. If a person has committed two or more infringements, or is convicted by a court of two or more offences arising out of the same circumstances, demerit points are recorded only in relation to one such infringement or offence, being the infringement or offence to which the highest number of demerit points applies. The demerit points in respect of offences or infringements by operators and drivers are recorded separately even if they arise out of the same circumstances. If a person appeals against a conviction by the court for an offence no demerit points are recorded unless the appeal is rejected or abandoned in which case demerit points are incurred in the prescribed manner. 11. REDUCTION OF DEMERIT POINTS If demerit points have been incurred by an Infringer, such total number of points as recorded in the national contraventions register on NaTIS against that person will be reduce with one (1) point for every three (3) months during which no demerit points were incurred by that person, except for the time the court found that the court process had been deliberately delayed by that person to obtain a reduction in points. 12. PROHIBITION ON DRIVING OR OPERATING MOTOR VEHICLE If a person incurs demerit points which, when added to the points previously recorded against that person in the national contraventions register on NaTIS, exceeds a total of twelve (12), that person will be disqualified from driving or operating a motor vehicle. The disqualification period equals in months the number of points by which the total of twelve (12) is exceeded, multiplied by three (3). A person who is so disqualified:
Any person who drives or operates a motor vehicle during his or her disqualification period is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding one (1) year or to both a fine and such imprisonment. Upon expiry of his or her disqualification period, a person may apply to the issuing authority to return his or her driving licence or professional driving permit or to reissue an operator card. 13. CANCELLATION OF A DRIVING LICENCE, PROFESSIONAL DRIVING PERMIT OR OPERATOR CARD A person who incurs demerit points resulting in a disqualification to drive or operate a motor vehicle for a third (3rd) time, must immediately hand in his or her driving licence, professional driving permit or operator card issued in respect of that vehicle to the issuing authority. Upon receipt of such a driving licence, professional driving permit or operator card, as the case may be, the authority will take the necessary steps to destroy such licence, permit or card. Upon expiry of his or her disqualification period, a person may reapply for and be issued with a driving licence, professional driving permit or operator card in terms of the applicable road traffic laws.
The procedures, as provided for in the AARTO Act and briefly described above, provide for a transparent, fair and effective system to manage and control road traffic offences and infringements, and should contribute to a large extent to:
Click here to download AARTO in a nutshell Also visit the following section:
I-Cube or Integrated Intelligent Imaging (I3) focuses of proactive crime prevention using real time links to multiple internal and external databases in order to generate a warning prior to crime occurring, allowing anticipation of the offence. All the projects I-Cube is involved with have a central theme of using images, as this allows both the real time and covert nature of the proactive crime prevention systems to operate to the best effect. HOW THE SYSTEM WORKS: As the person or car approaches the entrance a camera captures a number of images from which the license plate or face are extracted. These images are saved, allowing this information to be used in subsequent investigations. The face or license plate is then compared to local databases, allowing greeting of repeat visitors and external databases, such as insurance companies, stolen and suspicious vehicles, SAPS, Metro, etc. If the vehicle is listed as stolen, appropriate action should then be taken. If the vehicle is listed as never have been registered, this is a good vehicle to investigate further. Within a short period of the system being in operation, most vehicles and people have been logged and registered, allowing typically limited resources to be focused on the few remaining exceptions. The ability to leverage the equipment to operate in a marketing role, while still actively focusing on proactive crime prevention, has major advantages in a cash limited environment. If you have more than 50 people a day passing a point where we can place a camera, I-Cube has the experience and ability to turn this into a revenue stream. Please contact I-Cube to explore this further. WHAT IS REQUIRED: The key to proactive crime prevention using real time links is that the system does not require human intervention, it is fully automatic. The camera automatically captures the image, the facial or license plate is automatically compared to both local and remote databases and if required an alarm is generated. The I-Cube solution can operate locally but using a wide range of communication means (including ADSL, 3G, GPRS, iBURST, Wireless or satellite) a real time link to multiple databases can be established, allowing immediate updates of stolen vehicles as they are added to SAPS or the insurance databases. The system requires a camera linked to a computer, running the I-Cube Intelligent Software. The software is trained to recognise the item to be logged or counted, be that people, cars or different types of products. Once the item is logged, it can then be compared to pre-set rules or databases, allowing an alarm to be generated if the incorrect number of products exit or a vehicle enters after hours or is listed as not allowed. The ability to link vehicle colour, weight, and driver, biometric and other info as required to the license plate gives the I-Cube system tremendous advantages. I-Cube can integrate with your existing system or provide dedicated cameras, computers and networks. Please contact I-Cube with your requirements and existing equipment. WHAT DOES IT COST: I-Cube can provide database links only, software only, some hardware and software or a complete solution, fully installed and maintained, if required? The cost can be a capital amount, a rental per month, a cost per transaction or shared revenue. Costs range from 0.13c per chicken (based on 100 000 birds a day) to 3c per car (based on single entry / exit lanes) to R1 950.00 per month to R49 500.00 for the software and hardware. Please contact I-Cube for your specific requirements. The following illustrates some examples of the users of this technology. Please contact I-Cube or your local IT / CCTV / DVR / biometric supplier for a customised proposal, taking into consideration your requirements, existing solutions and possible revenue sources. SCHOOL: The entrance of the school is covered with a camera, which is linked wirelessly to a PC running the I-Cube software. The students, staff and parents are enrolled into a local database, which allows specific messages to be placed on an electronic display, while visitors are directed to the visitor parking area and then to reception. The schools limited manpower resources can then focus on the visitors, rather than the known parents or staff. Please contact I-Cube for more details. DISTRIBUTION CENTRE: The ability to link the license plate, driver facial image, vehicle type and colour, container number and weight of the truck and weight of goods listed on the invoice prevents unauthorised removal of any items. Productivity per vehicle is up while the number of hours wasted at weigh bridges has been substantially reduced, as the distribution centre no longer allows vehicles out which would be fined for overloading. Please contact I-Cube for more details. GOLF ESTATE: The existing cameras at the entrance and at key points through the estate were linked to the I-Cube LPR software allowing all visitors and residents to be logged at a number of points through the estate. The system was linked to a national database of suspect and stolen cars, allowing proactive crime prevention. When an alarm is detected, the armed reaction team are called into action, supporting the estate front end guards. A side effect of the I-Cube LPR solution is that the average speed of the vehicles is automatically determined, ensuring the estate remains children friendly. Please contact I-Cube for more details. OFFICE BLOCK: Parking, or rather the lack of parking within the office block was the reason to call I-Cube. Each tenant has a certain number of bays allocated for staff and visitors. When these bays were occupied and more vehicles were allowed into the office block, major congestion resulted, causing severe frustration for both visitors and office workers. I-Cube utilised the existing cameras to count the number of vehicles into and out of the office block. When the number of vehicles approached critical level, a mobile LPR system was deployed and staff parking in visitor areas were requested to remove their vehicles. Failure to comply led to banning of those vehicles for a certain number of days, again utilising the I-Cube enabled LPR solution. Please contact I-Cube for more details. NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH: The problem faced by the neighbourhood watch was not that of limited resources or money, but of how to prevent known criminals from entering the area patrolled by the neighbourhood watch. The exiting dome cameras were linked to the I-Cube LPR solution, plus a mobile LPR solution was provided. All vehicles and people entering the neighbourhood watch area were recorded and match against the known criminals. If matched, these people were approached and asked to explain where they were going and what they were doing. Car theft was reduced substantially while contact crimes no longer occur. Please contact I-Cube for more details. TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT: The department had a recovery rate of fewer than 30% of all fines issued. I-Cube introduced a road block LPR solution which allowed the traffic department to generate an alarm when a vehicle with an outstanding fine or warrant was detected. These vehicles were then automatically pulled over to a parking area where the drivers were informed of any fines or warrants were issued. The drivers had the option to pay any amounts outstanding via credit card, check or cash via the I-Cube supplied mobile payment systems. The number of outstanding fines has improved substantially to more than 70%. Please contact I-Cube for more details. TAXI ROUTE MONITORING & ENFORCEMENT: If taxi routes are not regulated commuters along non profitable routes are not serviced and violence between competing taxi associations often results. If the taxi routes are monitored with the I-Cube LPR solution illegal operators are immediately identified and prevented from operating. Where two of these monitoring points are linked, average speed determination can be determined and the number of trips per taxi per day can be calculated and communicated to the taxi owners. Please contact I-Cube for more details. TRUCK OVERWEIGHT ENFORCEMENT: A number of kilometres before the truck reaches the off ramp to the official weighbridge where a fine would be issued, the license plate is captured using the I-Cube LPR solution and weight is determined using an in line weigh sensor. If the weight per axle or total weight exceeds that allowed, the license truck is sent a message via the variable message signs (VMS) that it is required to exit on the next off ramp and proceed to the weigh bridge. If the driver / vehicle proceed past the off ramp or do not go to the weigh bridge, an alarm is generated, allowing the truck to be chased / pulled over further ahead or logged for further action. Please contact I-Cube for more details. A NUMBER OF OTHER EXAMPLES EXIST: Please contact I-Cube for more details.
|
|
|