|
Welcome to I-Cube: South Africa's leading provider of
License
Plate Recognition; Facial
Recognition & Image
Analysis |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
DEMOS LPR Demo of RSA Customised Plates. zip (3 MB) SPEED DETERMINATION DEMO (2 MB) Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) for Law Enforcement KZN gets high-tech speed cameras New speed monitoring system tested Reference Sites Particulars of LPR projects carried out successfully |
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES ACT, 1998 (Act No. 46 of 1998) AS AMENDED DRAFT ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES REGULATIONS, 2007 The Minister of Transport hereby publish for comments the regulations contained in the Schedule, in terms section 34 of the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Act, 1998 (Act No. 46 of 1998).
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES
ACT, 1998 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES The Minister of Transport has, under section 34 of the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Act, 1998, made the regulations in the Schedule. Schedule
Interpretation of regulations Regulations
Administrative functions 2. Execution of administrative functions the Agency by the Corporation Adjudication procedure 3. Infringement notice Penalties, discount and fees 10. Penalties Manner of payment 13. Payment to issuing authority Record keeping 18. Information to be recorded Service of process 20. Personal service General 22. Nominating driver
Schedules
CHAPTER 1
Interpretation of regulations 1. In these regulations, any word or expression which has been defined in the Act has that meaning and any word or expression defined in the National Road Traffic Act, 1996 or the Road Traffic Regulations, 2000 has that meaning, and unless the context indicates otherwise –
Administrative functions 2. The administrative functions of the Agency that arises as a result of infringement notices to be issued, representation to be made by the infringers and allocated to the representation officers, courtesy letters, enforcement orders, warrants, service of notices and other administrative functions concerning the recording of information, reception and dispatch of mail, as approved by the Registrar, shall be executed by the Corporation on behalf of the Agency: Provided that the Corporation shall not provide any service to the Agency that entails that it shall execute any discretion or decision on behalf of the Agency.
Adjudication procedure 3. (1) An infringement notice contemplated in section 17(1) of the Act shall be issued and served to the infringer -
(2) Subject to the provisions of section 17(1)(b) of the Act, the infringement notice shall contain the following additional information -
Representations 4. (1) Subject to regulation 2, the representations contemplated in section 18 or 19(2)(b)(i) of the Act, must be submitted to the agency on a form similar to form AARTO 10 as shown in Schedule 1, in the manner contemplated in regulation 23(1)(a) and the infringer must keep a copy of such representation. (2) Subject to regulation 2, the agency must within seven days from the date of receipt of representations, acknowledge the receipt of such representations on a form similar to form AARTO 11 as shown in Schedule 1, in the manner contemplated in regulation 23(4). (3) If the infringer has not received any acknowledgement contemplated in subregulation (2), from the agency within 21 days of the date on which the infringer submitted representations, the infringer must –
(4) The manner in which the representations officer must inform the issuing authority concerned that a representation indicating reasonable grounds why the infringer should not be held liable have been received, as contemplated in section 18(4)(a) of the Act, is by a notification made in terms of regulation 23(2). (5) The issuing authority shall reply to the representation received in terms of regulation 4(4) within 14 days of receipt of such representation from the Agency. (6) Subject to regulation 2 , the manner in which the issuing authority must give notice to the agency in terms of section 17(2) of the Act, that an infringer has failed to comply with an infringement notice within the period contemplated in section 17(1) of the Act, is to submit an electronic data file on which the information known in respect of the infringer and the infringement appears, to the agency in accordance with regulation 23(1), within such period, not exceeding 32 days, as may be agreed upon between the issuing authority and the agency. (7) The information that must be provided on the electronic file, as contemplated in subregulation (6), is set out in Schedule 5.
5. Subject to regulation 2, the manner in which the agency must
inform an infringer of the decision of the representation officer in respect of
his or her representations, is by providing the infringer with a properly
completed form similar to forms AARTO 12, AARTO 13 or AARTO 14, as applicable,
as shown in Schedule 1 in accordance with regulation 23(3). 6. Subject to regulation 2, the agency shall issue a courtesy letter in terms of section 19(1) of the Act, on a form similar to form AARTO 17 as shown in Schedule 1 and within such period, not exceeding 32 days, as may be agreed upon between the authority and the agency, after receipt of the notice contemplated in subregulation 4(6). 7. (1) The Registrar shall issue an enforcement order as contemplated in section 20(1) of the Act on a form similar to form AARTO 18 as shown in Schedule 1. (2) Subject to regulation 2. the manner in which the agency must notify the infringer, as contemplated in section 20(1)(c) of the Act, that demerit points have been recorded on the national contraventions register, is by means of a properly completed form similar to form AARTO 32 as shown in Schedule 1. (3) The manner in which an infringer may provide proof that he or she has paid the penalty and fees specified in the enforcement order as contemplated in section 20(6) of the Act, is by providing to a registering authority or driving licence testing centre -
(4) Subject to regulation 2, a registering authority or driving licence testing centre must, within such period, not exceeding 32 days after the date on which payment was received, notify the agency in terms of section 20(8) of the Act that it has received payment contemplated in section 20(7) of the Act, by providing the agency with an electronic data file on which particulars of the said payment appears. (5) The manner in which an infringer may apply to the agency for the revocation of the enforcement order as contemplated in section 20(9)(a) of the Act, is by submitting a properly completed form similar to form AARTO 19 as shown in Schedule 1 to the agency in accordance with regulation 23(1)(a). (6) The agency must, within 21 days from the date of receipt of an application contemplated in subregulation (5), notify the infringer of the result of the application on a form similar to forms AARTO 21, AARTO 22, AARTO 24, AARTO 25, AARTO 26 or AARTO 27, as the case may be, as shown in Schedule 1. (7) The manner in which an issuing authority may apply to the agency for the revocation of the enforcement order as contemplated in section 20(9)(b) of the Act, is to submit to the agency in accordance with regulation 23(1)an electronic data file on which the reference number of the infringement notice, the particulars of the infringer and the reason for the application appear,. (8) The agency must notify the issuing authority contemplated in subregulation (7) of the result of its application, by submitting such result on an electronic data file to the said issuing authority, within 21 days from the date of receipt of an application contemplated in subregulation (7). 8. (1) The Registrar shall, after a period of 14 days has elapsed,
which period shall be calculated from the first day after the expiry of a period
referred to in section 20(3)(a) of the Act, issue a warrant contemplated in
section 21(1) of the Act on a form similar to form AARTO 35 as shown in
Schedule 1;
(3) Subject to subregulation (2), the sheriff must execute a warrant contemplated in -
(4) If the infringer presents a bank cheque for payment of the penalty and fees due or part thereof, the sheriff –
9. (1) The manner in which an infringer may elect to be tried in court -
(2) An election form submitted by an infringer as contemplated in subregulation (1), must -
(3) A prosecutor who declines to prosecute a matter –
must notify both the agency and the issuing authority in terms of section 22(2)(a) of the Act, by providing the agency and the issuing authority in accordance with regulation 23(1) and (2) respectively, with a properly completed form similar to form AARTO 16 as shown in Schedule 1. Penalties, discount and fees 10. (1) The penalty contemplated in section 29(b) of the Act, which is payable in respect of an infringement mentioned in columns 3 and 4 of Schedule 3 is calculated in accordance with the penalty units set out against it in column 6 of Schedule 3, where each unit has a monetary value as described in paragraph (a) of Schedule 2. (2) The penalty amount payable in respect of an infringement mentioned in columns 3 and 4 of Schedule 3, calculated in accordance with subsection (1), is set out against it in column 8 of that Schedule. (3) Except for an operator, no demerit points will be allocated to an infringer who is a juristic person, but the penalty will be calculated on the basis of three times the units indicated in column 6 of Schedule 3 against the infringement concerned mentioned in columns 3 and 4 of that Schedule. 11. (1) (a) Subject to paragraph (b), the discount contemplated in section 17(1)(d) of the Act is set out in paragraph (b) of Schedule 2. (b) An infringer who holds a foreign driving licence or an international driving permit shall not be entitled to any discount as set out in Schedule 2 and shall be liable to pay the full amount as reflected in Schedule 3. (2) The discount amount deductible in respect of an infringement mentioned in columns 3 and 4 of Schedule 3, calculated in accordance with subsection (1), is set out against it in column 9 of that Schedule. (3) Subject to paragraph (1)(b), the discounted amount payable in
respect of an infringement within the 32 days after the infringement notice was
received is set out in column 10 of Schedule 3 12. (1) The fees which may be charged for any document, order or action required to be issued, made or performed as contemplated in section 34 (d) of the Act, are set out in paragraph (c) of Schedule 2. (2) The infringer is not liable for the fee which may be charged for - (a) a courtesy letter, if the infringer provides proof that he or she did comply with one of the options contemplated in section 17(1)(f) of the Act, on or before the 32 days period expires; or (b) an enforcement order, if the infringer provides proof that he or she has paid the penalty on or before the date on which the enforcement order was issued. Manner of payment 13. (1) The manner in which any payment of a penalty must be made by an infringer to an issuing authority as contemplated in section 17, read with section 34(e), of the Act, is by paying the full amount due -
(2) Post dated bank cheques shall not be acceptable. (3) Any payment to the issuing authority contemplated in subregulation (1)(a) and (b) –
(4) If payment is made -
14. (1) Subject to regulation 2, the manner in which an infringer must make any payment of a penalty and fee or fees to the agency, is by -
(2) Any payment of the penalty and fees to the agency, which payment includes a partial payment, dishonoured payment and an application to pay in installments, is regarded as an admission of guilt by the infringer. (3) The manner in which a payment contemplated in subregulation (1)(a) must be made by an infringer to the agency as contemplated in sections 18(1)(f)(iii), 19(7)(b), 20(2)(b) and 21(3)(a), read with section 34(e), of the Act, is by -
(4) If a payment to the agency is made in the manner contemplated in subregulations (3) or (9), the infringer must ensure that the infringement notice number appears on the deposit slip, debit order or stop order instruction of any payment completed at a bank contemplated in the said subregulations. (5) If the infringer provides an incorrect number on the deposit slip, debit order or stop order instruction as contemplated in subregulation (4), and such incorrect number results in the issuing of an enforcement order or warrant, whichever is applicable, by the agency, the infringer shall be liable to pay any extra administrative cost. (6) If payment of the penalty contemplated in subregulation (1), was received before an enforcement order was issued, the agency must, subject to regulation 2, notify the infringer on a form similar to form AARTO 32 as shown in Schedule 1, that the demerit points have been recorded against his or her name in the national contraventions register in respect of the infringement in question. (7) Subject to regulation 2, the manner in which an infringer may pay a penalty in installments as contemplated in section 17(1)(f)(iii) of the Act, read with section 34(e) of the Act, is by applying to the agency, on a form similar to form AARTO 06 as shown in Schedule 1, to pay the penalty and fees in instalments. (8) The agency, in the case of an application to pay a penalty in installments,-
(9) A payment in installments must be made before or on the first day of each month until full settlement thereof has been made, by -
(10) If the infringer fails to pay or partially pays an instalment as contemplated in subregulation (9) in terms of section 19B(2)(a) of the Act -
(11) If a payment contemplated in subregulation (1) is received from an infringer after a period of 32 days from the date on which a form similar to forms AARTO 07, AARTO 12, AARTO 16, AARTO 17, AARTO 18 or AARTO 29, as applicable, was served on the infringer, the agency -
(12)
Manner of payment to registering authority or driving licence testing centre where enforcement order has been served 15. (1) The manner in which any payment of a penalty and fees must be made by an infringer to any registering authority or driving licence testing centre in terms of section 20(7) of the Act, read with section 34(e) of the Act, is by paying the cash amount or by paying with a bank cheque, in person at such registering authority or driving licence testing centre.
(3) The registering authority or driving licence testing centre that has received payment in terms of subregulation (1) and (2) shall issue a receipt directly to the infringer and notify the agency electronically. (4) If any payment of a penalty or fees contemplated in subregulation (1) is dishonoured, the registering authority or driving licence testing centre concerned must notify the agency in the manner contemplated in regulation 22(1), and the matter must be dealt with in the manner contemplated in regulation 15(2). Dishonoured payments 16. (1) If a payment of a penalty contemplated in regulation 13(1), is dishonoured, the issuing authority concerned must notify the agency in the manner contemplated in regulation 6(1), where after the matter is dealt with in the manner contemplated in subregulation (2). (2) If any payment of a penalty and fees contemplated in regulation 14(1)(a) or 15(1) is dishonoured, the agency must, after receipt of the notification contemplated in regulation 15(4) in the event that payment was made in terms of regulation 15(1), notify the infringer on a form similar to form AARTO 31 as shown in Schedule 1, -
and such notification is regarded to be equivalent to an enforcement order, issued under section 20 of the Act. 17. Where provision is made in terms of this Chapter for a period within which an application or payment must be made, such period must be construed as a period of grace allowed to the infringer, during which period he or she may make such application or payment without being liable for any further administrative penalties. Record keeping 18. (1) A person who has personally served an infringement notice must return the copy of such infringement notice to the issuing authority where the contents of such notice must be recorded on the national contraventions register, and it must be verified whether it has been complied with within 32 days. (2) If an infringement notice is served by registered mail, the issuing authority must, for the purposes of section 30(2) of the Act, keep the receipt issued by the post office that accepted the notice for registration. (3) Each issuing authority, registering authority and driving licence testing centre must retain records of all transactions executed by it in terms of the Act. (4) The agency must, for the purposes of section 30(2) of the Act, keep all receipts issued by post offices for the acceptance of documents that are served by registered mail, and keep a record for purposes of further reference of all -
(5) The manner in which record must be kept of payments received and receipts issued, is by electronic image, until the time the record is disposed of as contemplated in regulation 19(5). 19. (1) The manner, in which any information regarding any offence or infringement is to be recorded in the national contraventions register, is by an electronic file. (2) The manner, in which the national contraventions register must be updated as contemplated in the Act, is by transferring an electronic data file from the issuing authority or agency to the national contraventions register. (3) The issuing authority must –
(4) The agency must keep record of all the cases which were referred to the court for appeal or review in connection with the demerit points recorded against a person in the national contraventions register, as well as the outcome of such cases. (5) Subject to the written authorisation of the National Archivist as contemplated in section 13 (2)(a) of the National Archives of South Africa Act, 1996, (Act No. 43 of 1996), the registrar may dispose of any document contemplated in this Chapter, after -
(6)
Service of process
20. (1) Personal service is achieved when the document to be served, is delivered to an infringer identified in the document, in person. (2) If the infringer identified in a document is served in person, he or she must accept the document on the request of the person who serves it. (3) An infringer who fails to comply with subregulation (2) is guilty of an offence and liable on conviction to a fine or imprisonment for a period not exceeding three months. (4) The person who serves a document must explain to the infringer the contents of -
(5) The person who serves a document must -
and for the purposes of this subregulation, when a building other than a hotel, boarding house, hostel or similar residential building, is occupied by more than one person or family, “place of residence” or “place of business” means the portion of the building which is occupied by the person upon whom service is to be effected. (8) If service is to be effected on -
21. If a document is to be served by registered mail, the document must be addressed to the infringer’s -
General 22. (1) The manner in which the licensed owner of a motor vehicle must provide the information contemplated in section 17(1)(f)(v) of the Act, is by submitting a properly completed form similar to form AARTO 08 as shown in Schedule 1 to the issuing authority in accordance with regulation 23(2). (2) The issuing authority shall acknowledge receipt of the nomination of the driver as contemplated in paragraph (a) on a form similar to form AARTO 9, within a period of 14 days from receiving such nomination. (3) If the licensed owner has not received any acknowledgement contemplated in subregulation (2), from the issuing authority within 21 days of the date on which the infringer submitted representations, the infringer must –
Manner of application, notification or submission 23. (1) Any application, notification or submission to the agency must be made by-
but affidavits contemplated in regulations 4(1) and 7(4) may only be submitted in the manner set out in paragraph (a). (2) Any application, notification or submission to the issuing authority must be made by -
but an affidavit, the form on which the infringer elects to appear in court and the form on which the driver or person in control is nominated, may only be submitted in the manner set out in paragraph (a) or (b). (3) Any notification to the infringer must be made by -
(4) Any acknowledgement to the infringer must be made by posting it to the postal address of the infringer. 24. (1) The demerit points to be incurred in respect of an infringement set out against it in column 3 of Schedule 3 are as set out in column 7 of that Schedule. (2) The demerit points incurred in respect of an operator for infringements set out in column 11 of Schedule 3 shall be as indicated for the infringements charged for under section 49 of the National Road Traffic Act as indicated in Column 11 of Schedule 3. (3) The total number of demerit points which, if exceeded, disqualifies a person from driving a motor vehicle, as contemplated in section 29(d) of the Act, is 12 points. (4) The total number of points that will result in the suspension of the operator cards of an operator shall be as contemplated in Schedule 4. (5) The notice contemplated in section 26(1) of the Act, by which a person must be informed that he or she has incurred more than the number of demerit points referred to in subregulations (3) and (4), must be on a form similar to form AARTO 33 as shown in Schedule 1. (6) An application contemplated in section 25(3) of the Act, to the issuing authority to return a person’s driving licence or professional driving permit as contemplated in section 25(5) of the Act, must be submitted to the issuing authority on a form LL1 or DL1, whichever is applicable, as shown in the Road Traffic Regulations. 25.
26. (1) These regulations are called the Administrative
Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences Regulations, 2007, and shall, subject to
subregulation (2), come into operation on 1 September 2007 for the municipal
area of Tshwane.
SCHEDULE 1 General Forms
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES SCHEDULE 2 Monetary value of Penalty Unit, Discount and Fees in terms of Regulation 5(2)
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES SCHEDULE 3 Categories of offences and infringements, penalty units, penalty and discount amounts and demerit points in terms of Regulation 23(1) and 23(2)
Key to columns in Schedule:
Key to abbreviations in Schedule:
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES REGULATIONS, 2007 SCHEDULE 4 Total number of points that will result in the suspension of the operator
card
1. Every motor vehicle, for which an operator card is issued, as contemplated in section 45 of the National Road Traffic Act, 1996, shall be subject to the conditions of this schedule.
2. The total number of points that an operator may incur, shall be in accordance with the number of vehicles owned by the operator. 3. The total number of demerit points, which, if exceeded, shall result in the suspension of the operator cards of an operator, shall be the total number of points given in the table below in accordance with the number of vehicles of the operator. 4. The operator of the drawing vehicle shall be charged, in the case of an infringement committed by a combination of motor vehicles: Provided that the operator of the drawing vehicle may submit representations to the agency, to present reasons to charge the operator of a trailer in such combination in stead of such operator. 5. Every demerit point over the maximum points, calculated in terms of
the number of vehicles given in the table below, shall result in a one month
suspension of all the operator cards of an operator.
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUDICATION OF ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENCES SCHEDULE 5 Information contemplated in terms of Regulations 18 and 19
At least the following information must be provided on the electronic data file referred to in regulations 18 and 19: 1. With regard to the person of the Infringer, his or her – 2. With regard to the Infringer’s address, the – 3. With regard to the Infringer’s contact detail, the – 4. With regard to a body of persons, the – 5. With regard to the motor vehicle, the – 6. With regard to the location of the infringement, the – 7. With regard to the specific infringement(s), the – 8. With regard to the officer, his or her – 9. With regard to the outcome of the offence and infringement
proceedings, the – 10. With regard to payments due, the – 11. With regard to representations officers, his or her – 12. With regard to sheriffs, his or her – 13. For data capturing purposes, the – Also visit the following sections:
I-Cube or Integrated Intelligent Imaging (I3) focuses of proactive crime prevention using real time links to multiple internal and external databases in order to generate a warning prior to crime occurring, allowing anticipation of the offence. All the projects I-Cube is involved with have a central theme of using images, as this allows both the real time and covert nature of the proactive crime prevention systems to operate to the best effect. HOW THE SYSTEM WORKS: As the person or car approaches the entrance a camera captures a number of images from which the license plate or face are extracted. These images are saved, allowing this information to be used in subsequent investigations. The face or license plate is then compared to local databases, allowing greeting of repeat visitors and external databases, such as insurance companies, stolen and suspicious vehicles, SAPS, Metro, etc. If the vehicle is listed as stolen, appropriate action should then be taken. If the vehicle is listed as never have been registered, this is a good vehicle to investigate further. Within a short period of the system being in operation, most vehicles and people have been logged and registered, allowing typically limited resources to be focused on the few remaining exceptions. The ability to leverage the equipment to operate in a marketing role, while still actively focusing on proactive crime prevention, has major advantages in a cash limited environment. If you have more than 50 people a day passing a point where we can place a camera, I-Cube has the experience and ability to turn this into a revenue stream. Please contact I-Cube to explore this further. WHAT IS REQUIRED: The key to proactive crime prevention using real time links is that the system does not require human intervention, it is fully automatic. The camera automatically captures the image, the facial or license plate is automatically compared to both local and remote databases and if required an alarm is generated. The I-Cube solution can operate locally but using a wide range of communication means (including ADSL, 3G, GPRS, iBURST, Wireless or satellite) a real time link to multiple databases can be established, allowing immediate updates of stolen vehicles as they are added to SAPS or the insurance databases. The system requires a camera linked to a computer, running the I-Cube Intelligent Software. The software is trained to recognise the item to be logged or counted, be that people, cars or different types of products. Once the item is logged, it can then be compared to pre-set rules or databases, allowing an alarm to be generated if the incorrect number of products exit or a vehicle enters after hours or is listed as not allowed. The ability to link vehicle colour, weight, and driver, biometric and other info as required to the license plate gives the I-Cube system tremendous advantages. I-Cube can integrate with your existing system or provide dedicated cameras, computers and networks. Please contact I-Cube with your requirements and existing equipment. WHAT DOES IT COST: I-Cube can provide database links only, software only, some hardware and software or a complete solution, fully installed and maintained, if required? The cost can be a capital amount, a rental per month, a cost per transaction or shared revenue. Costs range from 0.13c per chicken (based on 100 000 birds a day) to 3c per car (based on single entry / exit lanes) to R1 950.00 per month to R49 500.00 for the software and hardware. Please contact I-Cube for your specific requirements. The following illustrates some examples of the users of this technology. Please contact I-Cube or your local IT / CCTV / DVR / biometric supplier for a customised proposal, taking into consideration your requirements, existing solutions and possible revenue sources. SCHOOL: The entrance of the school is covered with a camera, which is linked wirelessly to a PC running the I-Cube software. The students, staff and parents are enrolled into a local database, which allows specific messages to be placed on an electronic display, while visitors are directed to the visitor parking area and then to reception. The schools limited manpower resources can then focus on the visitors, rather than the known parents or staff. Please contact I-Cube for more details. DISTRIBUTION CENTRE: The ability to link the license plate, driver facial image, vehicle type and colour, container number and weight of the truck and weight of goods listed on the invoice prevents unauthorised removal of any items. Productivity per vehicle is up while the number of hours wasted at weigh bridges has been substantially reduced, as the distribution centre no longer allows vehicles out which would be fined for overloading. Please contact I-Cube for more details. GOLF ESTATE: The existing cameras at the entrance and at key points through the estate were linked to the I-Cube LPR software allowing all visitors and residents to be logged at a number of points through the estate. The system was linked to a national database of suspect and stolen cars, allowing proactive crime prevention. When an alarm is detected, the armed reaction team are called into action, supporting the estate front end guards. A side effect of the I-Cube LPR solution is that the average speed of the vehicles is automatically determined, ensuring the estate remains children friendly. Please contact I-Cube for more details. OFFICE BLOCK: Parking, or rather the lack of parking within the office block was the reason to call I-Cube. Each tenant has a certain number of bays allocated for staff and visitors. When these bays were occupied and more vehicles were allowed into the office block, major congestion resulted, causing severe frustration for both visitors and office workers. I-Cube utilised the existing cameras to count the number of vehicles into and out of the office block. When the number of vehicles approached critical level, a mobile LPR system was deployed and staff parking in visitor areas were requested to remove their vehicles. Failure to comply led to banning of those vehicles for a certain number of days, again utilising the I-Cube enabled LPR solution. Please contact I-Cube for more details. NEIGHBOURHOOD WATCH: The problem faced by the neighbourhood watch was not that of limited resources or money, but of how to prevent known criminals from entering the area patrolled by the neighbourhood watch. The exiting dome cameras were linked to the I-Cube LPR solution, plus a mobile LPR solution was provided. All vehicles and people entering the neighbourhood watch area were recorded and match against the known criminals. If matched, these people were approached and asked to explain where they were going and what they were doing. Car theft was reduced substantially while contact crimes no longer occur. Please contact I-Cube for more details. TRAFFIC DEPARTMENT: The department had a recovery rate of fewer than 30% of all fines issued. I-Cube introduced a road block LPR solution which allowed the traffic department to generate an alarm when a vehicle with an outstanding fine or warrant was detected. These vehicles were then automatically pulled over to a parking area where the drivers were informed of any fines or warrants were issued. The drivers had the option to pay any amounts outstanding via credit card, check or cash via the I-Cube supplied mobile payment systems. The number of outstanding fines has improved substantially to more than 70%. Please contact I-Cube for more details. TAXI ROUTE MONITORING & ENFORCEMENT: If taxi routes are not regulated commuters along non profitable routes are not serviced and violence between competing taxi associations often results. If the taxi routes are monitored with the I-Cube LPR solution illegal operators are immediately identified and prevented from operating. Where two of these monitoring points are linked, average speed determination can be determined and the number of trips per taxi per day can be calculated and communicated to the taxi owners. Please contact I-Cube for more details. TRUCK OVERWEIGHT ENFORCEMENT: A number of kilometres before the truck reaches the off ramp to the official weighbridge where a fine would be issued, the license plate is captured using the I-Cube LPR solution and weight is determined using an in line weigh sensor. If the weight per axle or total weight exceeds that allowed, the license truck is sent a message via the variable message signs (VMS) that it is required to exit on the next off ramp and proceed to the weigh bridge. If the driver / vehicle proceed past the off ramp or do not go to the weigh bridge, an alarm is generated, allowing the truck to be chased / pulled over further ahead or logged for further action. Please contact I-Cube for more details. A NUMBER OF OTHER EXAMPLES EXIST: Please contact I-Cube for more details.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||