|
By Tim Weber
Business Editor, BBC News website, in
Davos
|
Byte by byte, the internet is taking away our privacy - but is
that a good or a bad thing?
Are your personal details protected?
|
Remember the last time you shopped in your local supermarket? Did
the freckly 18-year-old at the till demand that you tell him your
birthday, where you live, your e-mail address, and whether you are
interested in music or sport?
And would you have walked out had he done so?
But here we are, happily giving out this and much more
information when we shop online, sign up for a newspaper's website
or subscribe to an e-mail service.
At least we know when we are giving away our personal data.
But have you ever used Google Earth? It's a nifty application
that allows you to fly over the world and zoom in on any location
with startling detail.
Whoever knows your address can find out how many cars you've got
parked in your drive, what colour they are, and whether you have a
swimming pool in your garden.
If you didn't tell the local authority's planning officer about
your little building project, she can find out without leaving her
desk.
And if we are cool with what's happening now, what about in five
years' time, when all PDAs have a camera and face recognition
software that some people can hook up to a powerful database that
can say who you are in no time.
So should we be bothered?
The convenience trap
"Not necessarily" was the answer of most participants
at a World Economic Forum session called "Privacy - it was nice
while we had it".
Because giving up your privacy can be great.
Amazon.com can tell you what kind of books or music you might be
interested in, and there is no pesky retyping of credit card numbers
anymore.
You get tailored news feeds, and an alert when your favourite
band starts its world tour at last.
 |
Anything that is digital will be captured,
potentially stored and probably kept for much longer
than you think
|
It even allows you to sort out your finances. In some countries,
getting a mortgage or car loan can be done online in 15 minutes
flat, because somebody somewhere knows your deeply private credit
history and shares it with the bank you want to get some money from.
We are happy because it is convenient. We part with private
information, and get something valuable in return - frequent flyer
miles, for example.
Or maybe it's just a return to village life, where everybody knew
everything about everyone else.
Except that this cyber-village has a few billion inhabitants.
So much data, so little use
Many participants in the session were industry experts and right
now, they say, it is actually surprising how little of the collected
data is actually used.
These firms "are sitting on terabytes of information, but
they can't figure out what to do with it - both for helping the
customer and for using it for themselves," said an online
industry consultant.
The point is, we don't live in societies that resemble 1984 or
Minority Report - yet.
But go to a specialist search agency in the United States and for
a mere $9, you will be able to get the most intimate lowdown on most
people from publicly accessible records held mainly by local, state
and federal authorities.
So we live in fear of what might be possible.
In the UK, mobile phone data was used to track the two
10-year-old murder victims in Soham, Holly Wells and Jessica
Chapman.
Many firms do not use much of the data they hold, Davos
heard
|
Mobile phone data gave away the movements of several people
suspected of having planted the devastating Real IRA bomb in Omagh.
Good, you may say. But did you realise that in the European
Union, all mobile networks have to keep a record of every call and
every move your mobile phone made while it was switched on.
"Anything that is digital will be captured, potentially
stored and probably kept for much longer than you think," says
a maker of databases.
And let's not get started on the subject of DNA databases.
Still sitting comfortably?
Ultimately, privacy may not be the issue.
Rather, the point is whether all this data of ours is held
securely - or can be stolen or used in a way you don't want.
And it's not just ID theft and the hassle of getting your credit
rating or your reputation restored.
 |
So what is really happening at the World Economic
Forum
|
In China, the internet service Yahoo was recently forced by the
authorities to give up the identity of a government critic.
It comes down to trust. Do you trust whoever holds your data? And
do you know what they propose to do with it?
Most people apparently can't be bothered.
A website recently added a note at the bottom of its privacy
policy, offering $5,000 to people who had read this document.
It took about 3,000 customers using the service until one person
actually read the whole thing and claimed the prize.
But here in Davos, at least, privacy still applies. Because of
World Economic Forum rules for certain sessions, the speakers in
this discussion can not be identified.